The matter involving the Minister of Health is one of much provocation by that female who calls herself a rights activist. What rights is she defending or promoting? I guess the rights to provoke and to be disrespectful to all and sundry.
This is the example she is portraying to other women – that you have a mouth, so you can open it and say anything, anywhere, anytime and anyhow. There are those among us who have no respect for time and place, talking about rights which they misuse.
Some of their favourite terms include: freedom of speech, so they talk out of place and no one dareS touch them. This is a public road, so the law cannot remove them.
What connection did she have with the court matter in question? Has she a right to be there and not anyone else? What was that right? Who was she to question the Minister on his presence there?
She claimed to be a tax payer whose money pays the Minister, and because of that he ought not to be there!
Name withheld by request